In today’s automotive industry, software engineering is more than simply a back-office activity; it is a driving force behind innovation and competitive advantage. As cars become increasingly complex software-enabled machines, automobile companies are under more pressure than ever to keep up with the latest technological advancements.
This fast-changing market encourages manufacturers and suppliers to make a vital decision: should they build software in-house or collaborate with external specialists through outsourcing?
Each possibility has significant advantages. In-house development gives unprecedented control and alignment with corporate cultures whereas outsourcing grants access to specialized skills and cutting-edge technology without maintaining a large permanent workforce.
In this article, we’ll look at the reasons driving demand for automotive software engineering and compare the advantages and disadvantages of in-house development and outsourcing. Our mission is to provide automotive companies with the information they need to make the correct strategic decisions.
Why is automotive software taking the wheel?
The automotive industry is going through a profound shift driven by rapid technological innovations and ever-increasing customer expectations. This transition is changing how vehicles are designed, built, and even operated, resulting in new demands—and opportunities—for automotive software engineers.
Statista: “The size of the global market for automotive software, electrical and electronic components is projected to double between 2020 and 2030. While the market was sized at some 238 billion U.S. dollars in 2020, it is expected to reach the size of about 469 billion U.S. dollars in 2030.”
Innovations in technology are changing the rules
The automotive industry is changing immensely through the integration of technologies like autonomous driving, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and connected car systems. Autonomous vehicles, for example, rely on advanced software to handle enormous volumes of sensor data in real-time. From predictive maintenance to customized user experiences, AI aids in improving everything including IoT and connectivity that redefines interactions between vehicles and other devices including infrastructures.
These technological advances are not only enhancing vehicle capabilities but also posing intricate software development difficulties that require professional skills.
Cars have become computers on wheels
Modern cars have evolved from simple transportation machines into complex, interconnected systems. They are packed with state-of-the-art entertainment systems, telematics, and driver assistance technologies, all powered by advanced software. This has led to increased demand for skilled automotive software engineers who can design, integrate, and manage such complex systems.
Regulatory and safety standards are evolving.
Automotive system regulations are increasingly becoming more complex. Governments all over the world are enhancing safety and environmental regulations, mandating that car software not only improves vehicle performance but also adheres to strict safety guidelines.
ISO 26262 is a crucial standard that focuses on the functional safety of electrical and electronic systems in cars. Adhering to this standard requires rigorous testing, documentation, and development processes targeted at reducing safety risks throughout the vehicle’s lifecycle.
Meeting consumer expectations
Reliability, safety, and cutting-edge technology are the features of vehicles today’s consumers expect from their cars. This desire forces car manufacturers to innovate all the time, thus storming into traditional software engineering limits to create more intelligent, safer, and connected vehicles.
The dilemma: in-house development or outsourcing?
As the demand for smart automotive software grows, organizations must determine whether to develop software in-house or outsource to specialist partners.
Defining options
In-house development means having a dedicated team of software engineers who oversee all areas of software development within the organization. This method ensures that the development process is tightly controlled and in full alignment with the strategic objectives of the business.
On the other hand, outsourcing implies partnering with an external company specializing in automotive software engineering. In some cases, this can involve handing over entire projects or only some duties including testing or maintenance. In general terms, outsourcing allows getting resources and skills not existing internally at a relatively low cost.
Striking a balance. The hybrid approach
The automotive industry is increasingly adopting a hybrid approach that blends in-house development with outsourcing. Several important elements add to this trend:
Technological advancements: Keeping up with the rapid development of AI, IoT, and self-driving technologies frequently needs the particular knowledge that outsourcing partners can supply.
Cost efficiency: Outsourcing enables businesses to better manage expenses by avoiding the need to retain big in-house teams, especially for specialized or temporary projects.
Focus on core competencies: By outsourcing conventional or highly specialized tasks, businesses may focus their in-house resources toward core competencies and strategic goals.
Scalability and flexibility: Outsourcing allows businesses to easily scale their development efforts up or down in response to market demands without making long-term commitments for hiring in-house staff.
Outsourcing provides access to a worldwide pool of talent, allowing for the acquisition of skills and resources that may be in short supply domestically.
While each company’s decision may differ depending on project complexity, current capabilities, and financial constraints, the hybrid approach is increasingly viewed as a method to remain adaptable and innovative in a competitive market.
Make or break. Deciding between in-house and outsourcing
In automotive software engineering, deciding between in-house development and outsourcing requires careful consideration of factors such as project size and complexity, company resources, budget limits, future objectives, scalability requirements, and time-to-market pressures.
Project size and complexity
For larger projects that are much more difficult to undertake there is a good reason why one might consider the alternative of using outsourcing because it will have a wider range of abilities and resources. Alternatively, smaller projects or those with less technical complexity may be handled more efficiently internally.
So, outsourcing can be particularly effective when dealing with larger, more complex projects. Involving several specialist skill sets such as AI integration into self-driving cars or making improved telematics would save time and money by contracting the work to experts. Let’s take for instance an international automotive company that chooses to outsource AI predictive maintenance systems development to a machine learning algorithm expert company. This approach not only helps bring in some of the best minds but also ensures internal teams focus on key product development initiatives, thus ensuring all aspects of a project are addressed by the most qualified people.
Company size
Larger corporations with various skill sets may be well-equipped to manage development in-house, but smaller businesses may find outsourcing a more cost-effective way to have access to similar talents.
Outsourcing can help smaller businesses compete on the same level as bigger ones. A mid-sized automotive supplier may not have the substantial internal resources to develop complicated software solutions on its own. They can gain access to the same high-quality engineering skills and technology as a larger company without experiencing the extra costs associated with employing and maintaining full-time, highly specialized personnel.
Budget constraints
When it comes to budget constraints, the choice between in-house development and outsourcing often boils down to a trade-off between control and cost efficiency. Generally, outsourcing is more cost-effective, especially for specialized, high-skill areas like AI integration, data analytics, or complex software systems. However, there are scenarios where in-house development, despite its higher costs, might still be the preferred option.
Outsourcing can result in significant cost reductions, especially in high-skill areas such as AI integration and data analytics. Building these capabilities in-house usually requires significant investments in both manpower and technology. However, by outsourcing, businesses can access the essential expertise on a project-by-project basis, avoiding the long-term expenditures involved with recruiting, training, and maintaining specialized personnel.
Indeed, the initial cost of in-house development is higher. There are substantial expenses involved in finding, developing, and keeping qualified engineers. To support the development process, businesses also need to invest in the infrastructure, tools, and technologies that are required. In-house development requires a significant financial commitment because these expenses may add up quickly.
Long-term strategic goals
While in-house development may be best for efforts that are important to a company’s core business, outsourcing can be an appropriate option for peripheral projects.
Outsourcing non-core tasks allows businesses to focus their internal resources on what they do best.
Consider a large automobile manufacturer focusing on next-generation electric vehicle platforms: they may choose to outsource the development of a sophisticated infotainment system to specialists, freeing up their in-house team to focus on battery technology and vehicle design. This method ensures that both core and non-core projects are completed to a high standard while not straining the company’s internal resources too much.
Scalability needs
One of the most significant advantages of outsourcing is the ability to rapidly scale up or down. Automotive projects often require quick adjustments in reaction to market changes or new technological advances. Outsourcing allows you to scale development efforts without the long-term obligations that come with growing an in-house team. For example, if a car manufacturer has to quickly incorporate a new feature across numerous vehicle models, outsourcing can provide the personnel and knowledge required to achieve tight deadlines without disrupting other in-house initiatives.
While in-house teams provide more control and consistency, they may struggle to scale quickly unless the company is ready to invest considerably in expanding its workforce. This can be a major challenge in volatile markets where quick actions are necessary.
Time-to-market
In the competitive automotive sector, speed is crucial. Outsourcing can help companies speed up development and reduce time-to-market by providing immediate access to trained professionals who are ready to begin work without the setbacks that come with recruiting and training new in-house employees.
For example, a manufacturer seeking to launch an innovative driver-assistance feature may outsource the project to a company with extensive experience in ADAS (Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems). This allows the manufacturer to bring the product to market more quickly, seize early market share, and establish a competitive standard.
On the other hand, although internal teams can provide more alignment with business objectives, project execution may be delayed due to the time needed to find, onboard, and educate new employees. This is especially problematic in marketplaces that move quickly, where a product’s performance can be greatly impacted by being the first to market.
Outsourcing as a strategic advantage
Beyond these specific cases, outsourcing can be viewed as a strategic move that improves a company’s overall innovation capabilities. Collaborating with external experts not only provides companies with the technical expertise they need but also introduces new perspectives that can drive innovation. For example, an automotive company might partner with an external team to explore new technologies such as quantum computing for vehicle optimization. This allows the company to benefit from the partner’s cutting-edge research and development without redirecting resources from their core business.
In conclusion, while in-house development is still necessary for projects that are closely related to a company’s core skills, outsourcing provides several benefits that can significantly boost a company’s ability to innovate, scale, and compete. By carefully considering each project’s requirements, automotive businesses can strike the perfect balance between in-house development and outsourcing, leveraging the capabilities of both to create success in a continuously changing market.
Read more:
Top Reasons Why Software Development Outsourcing is so Successful
Romania as an IT Outsourcing Destination. Everything You Need To Know
Building strong partnerships in the automotive industry
Webchain is a leader in automotive innovation, offering significant expertise and tested approaches to enhance software system capabilities. Our software development services are designed to support your internal teams, allowing you to focus on your strengths while we tackle the complexity of software development.
Whether you want to improve your technological capabilities, streamline processes, or upgrade your software programs, we can help.
Contact us to see how we can help you navigate the future of automotive technology and drive your success forward.
